| Author |
|
Sacredstar
20+ Contributor
Joined: 10 October 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: 10 October 2004 at 7:23pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Following the governments announcement this
week about the nightmare of impending flooding.
Daily Express October 8
Subject: warning on earth changes from Drunvalo
Melchizedek. distributed by the Universal Alliance
News Agency
Dry/Ice: Global Warming Revealed
by Drunvalo Melchizedek
What you are about to read is going to change your
world forever, of this I can promise you. I actually
apologize that I have to be the one that brings this
un-settling news, but you must know if you wish
to survive for what is coming will either be DRY and
heat or ICE and freezing. Global warming has been
in the news for over 40 years, and by this time we
have become complacent. Our scientists have come
to the agreement that global warming will eventually
cause major changes and problems in the world,
but in their way of thinking it will be 50 to 100 years
before we will actually have to deal with the effects.
The general idea is that global warming will be slow
and the world will find time to discover the solutions
to the problems.
New powerful evidence strongly suggests that this
scenario is simply wrong, and we had better prepare
for another more abrupt possibility.
DISCOVERY MAGAZINE
One of the first hints that something may be different
than what we are being told (especially here in the
US) was published in Discover magazine in
September 2002 with the cover announcing Global
Warming Surprise, A New Ice Age ,Oceanographers
have discovered a huge river of freshwater in the
Atlantic formed by melting polar ice. They warn it
could soon bury the Gulf Stream, plunging North
American and Europe into frigid winters.
That was almost two years ago, and no one
listened. Life goes on oblivious to the incredible
danger approaching.
ENGLAND & SIR DAVID KING
Then in January 2004 enter Sir David King, England
s Minister of Science. Sir King went to Mr. Blair and
told him of the impending worldwide disaster and
that they needed to tell the world of what was about
to happen. Tony Blair told Sir David King to be quiet
and not speak. But Sir King felt that this was simply
too important for him to say nothing, so in January of
this year he deliberately went around Mr. Blair and
went straight to the American journal Science where
he published his information and concerns. Sir King
said in this article, In my view, climate change is the
most severe problem we are facing today, more
serious even than the threat of terrorism. England
placed a gag order on Sir David King, and now he is
not even allowed to discuss this subject publicly
without threat of detention.
AMERICA & THE PENTAGON
A month later in February 2004, the Pentagon
became involved, which has stirred the world to
action. The Pentagon has been studying Global
Warming for many years because of its possible
national security problems associated with the kind
of changes that could present themselves to the
world through Global Warming. A special study was
conducted through the Pentagon s Office of Net
Assessment directed by Andrew W. Marshall, 83,
with responsibility of identifying long-term threats to
the United States. Mr. Marshall went to a US based
think-tank called Global Business Network to
compile the possibilities of Global Warming on US
national security. A study was completed in October
of 2003 and released to the Pentagon, which was
looking at the worst that could happen. It was named
An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its
Implications for United States National Security. The
summary went far beyond what most Pentagon
experts had expected. Realizing the incredible
possibilities of this study, Mr. Marshall made a
decision to publicly report this and other information
to the American people. And probably because of
President Bush s stance on Global Warming, which
is beyond negative, he also decided to go around the
president, and he published his information and
concern in Fortune magazine on February 9th 2004.
Marshall explained how the melting North and South
poles and glaciers from around the world are
composed of fresh water and within this fact is the
basis of the impending global weather disaster.
The Gulf Stream or as scientifically referred to: North
Atlantic thermohaline Conveyor, is a stream of warm
saltwater that comes from south of the equator and
flows over the surface of the ocean toward the north
where this warm water keeps Northern America and
Northern and Western Europe from freezing. It also
holds most of the worlds weather patterns in the way
we are used to.
Then as this Gulf Stream cools down, it drops to the
bottom of the ocean and returns as a river in the
ocean to the south where it warms up again and
rises to the surface and then returns to the north one
more time in a continuous convection current. It is a
huge three dimensional figure eight. The motor that
keep this warm water flowing is found in the north
where the Gulf Stream drops to the bottom of the
ocean. It is the salt density of the ocean that causes
this river to drop and pulls the warm water up from
the south. Now that the poles are melting and fresh
water is flowing into the Atlantic Ocean and the salt
density is decreasing, the Gulf Stream does not drop
quite as far, which results in a slowing down of the
Stream. The Gulf Stream has been dramatically
slowing down now for at least ten years.
As the Gulf Stream slows down, the warmth is not
brought to the North Atlantic region, and the weather
patterns begin to change, for they are dependent on
this warmth to keep a balance.
THE MELTING POLES
During the Bush administration when discussions
have been held on the melting of the North & South
Poles, this government and US corporate entities
alike have stated that the world s scientists are all
wrong on their conclusions that say there is great
danger. This leads the American public to believe
there is no real problem at all.
However, George W. Bush was the focus of attack by
Sir David King when he wrote his article in Science
for the world s greatest scientific minds. At least one
thousand seven hundred of them, along with the
Union of Concerned Scientists say that Mr. Bush is ill
informed.. Since the US is responsible for
approximately 25% of the CO2 pollution that is
creating Global Warming, a discussion of Mr. Bush s
Global Warming policies is paramount. Perhaps one
of the best articles that summaries Mr. Bush s
position will be found in the ROLLING STONES
magazine article of May 19, 2004 by Tim Dickinson.
What follows in italics is a portion of this article.
Given the imminent threat from global warming, even
the Bush administration might be expected to launch
a War on Heat. After all, as a candidate in 2000,
George W. Bush vowed to "establish mandatory
reduction targets" for carbon-dioxide emissions,
saying he would make the issue a top priority.
Once Bush became president, however, reducing
carbon emissions was the first promise he broke --
and his record has been all downhill from there.
Only two months after taking office, the
administration withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol, the
global treaty that the United States signed in 1997 to
set strict limits on greenhouse emissions. Instead,
Bush instituted a voluntary emissions plan that has
been an abject failure: So far, only fourteen
companies have pledged to curb their CO2 output.
The president also folded the interagency group that
monitors climate change into the Commerce
Department -- led by Secretary Don Evans, a former
oil and gas executive. And he called for additional
climate research that would delay any meaningful
regulation for at least another decade. "We do not
know how much our climate could or will change in
the future," Bush declared in a speech in the Rose
Garden. Such statements spurred an open letter
signed by twenty Nobel laureates, who blasted the
administration for having "consistently sought to
undermine" public understanding of man's role in
global warming. (Bush's science adviser refused to
be interviewed for this article.) Then the censorship
began. In September 2002, the Environmental
Protection Agency released an air-quality report that -
for the first time since 1996 - included no mention of
global warming. Seven months later, the White
House made wholesale revisions to the
climate-change chapter of the EPA's "Report on the
Environment," playing down human influence,
deleting references to the health impacts of global
warming and inserting climate data funded in part by
the American Petroleum Institute. The EPA withdrew
the altered chapter, acknowledging in an internal
memo that it "no longer accurately represents
scientific consensus on climate change." Even
some Republicans have been astounded at Bush's
meddling in EPA affairs. "What seems constantly
evident with George W. Bush is that EPA is expected
to take its marching orders from the White House on
regulatory matters," says Russell Train, who headed
the agency under Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford.
"During my time, I never had that happen. Never."
Train, a recipient of a Presidential Medal of Freedom
from the elder Bush, calls the administration's
approach to global warming "totally wrong" and
"irresponsible."
Bush can rely on key Republicans in Congress to
block any efforts to curb pollution and stave off
disaster. Sen. James Inhofe, chairman of the
Environment and Public Works Committee,
dismisses global warming as a "hoax." In a speech
last July, Inhofe compared the IPCC to the Soviets
and extolled the virtues of what he called a
"CO2-enhanced" world. "It is my fervent hope," he
concluded, "that Congress will reject the prophets of
doom who peddle propaganda masquerading as
science in the name of saving the planet from
catastrophic disaster." From another point of view in
the same article we hear: They (the Bush
Administration) do not have a credible plan, either
domestically or internationally, for addressing the
problem (Global Warming), says Michael
Oppenheimer, a climatologist at Princeton
University. They (the Bush Administration) argue that
they don t want to address global warming, he says,
because the science is shaky . "That approach is
indefensible, because the science isn t shaky.
THE NORTH POLE MELTING
Let s look at the facts: Two summers ago the North
Pole completely melted for the first time in history
that we know of. Both private and military ships
floated directly over the actual North Pole as it was
completely water. This area has never been seen to
be less then ten feet of solid ice. Greenpeace a few
years ago announced that the North Pole s winter to
summer snow pack had receded by around three
hundred miles, but no one listened. And today, as I
am writing this article, we are witnessing the Alaska
fire that has consumed over one million acres of
forest. This fire is burning in an area that was always
wet with rain or snow until now. And this fire, as you
will understand in this article, is directly related to the
melting of the poles and the Gulf Stream. But finally
the Pentagon, thanks to Andrew Marshall, has told
the truth in the Fortune magazine on February 9th.
The Pentagon shows a satellite photo of the North
Pole in 1970 and then in 2003, which reveals that,
according to the Pentagon, 40% of the North Pole
has melted in just 33 years. And it is melting faster
and faster now. The Pentagon has now proven that
all these government statements that the poles are
not melting were simply a lie. And it is a lie more
damaging than anything that Bush s Iraq war could
possibly throw at the United States.
MAY PEACE PREVAIL ON EARTH AND IN SPACE
__________________
Heath and Education must change and catch up with new science and new biology. Solutions to the root causes. .
www.loveunion.org under construction.
www.academysounds.com www.angelshealing.co
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Sacredstar
20+ Contributor
Joined: 10 October 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 21
|
| Posted: 14 November 2004 at 6:32pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
"We thought (global warming) would happen
hundreds of years from now, but now ... it's our
children, it's us who have to deal with it," said Geir
Tommy Pedersen, president of the Saami Council
representing reindeer herders from Russia to
Norway.
"We are already beyond the time for action," he said.
(More in this article)
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u;=/nm/200
41112/wl_canada_nm/canada_environment_arctic_
col
<http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u;=/nm/20
041112/wl_canada_nm/canada_environment_arctic
_col>
__________________
Heath and Education must change and catch up with new science and new biology. Solutions to the root causes. .
www.loveunion.org under construction.
www.academysounds.com www.angelshealing.co
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
|
|
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Be The Change Forums : Ideas for 2005 Events
Topic: Earth Changes
