Sacredstar
30+ Contributor
Joined: 10 October 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: 10 March 2006 at 12:20pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Dear All
How do you feel about the academics suppressing the truth from the
people? It seems to me that there need to be a campaign to address this
issue.
Dear Kim,
Thanks for your email. I agree with your 'Self development and self
realisation should be a part of every educational process. My view is that
the new science and the new biology will bring about this paradigm shift
and when embraced by health and education there will be a domino
effect'.
However, a problem arises if we are compelled to act within a false and
unethical worldview logic. This was explained this week in an article on
Higher Education in the Australian newspaper. The article titled Muzzling
of science by Professor Julian Cribb, at the University of Technology,
Sydney,and Editor of R & D Review, published in The Australian Wed. 8,
2006, page 26 Higher Education, upholds the importance of Bolzano's
Theory of Science,which, in redefining aesthetics, completely challenged
the prevailing worldview. Not only was Bolzano's work selected, as
perhaps the most important logic paper from the world literature, reviews
associated it with the modern extention of quantum mechanics that also
upgrading our fixed worldview ethics.
Professor Julian Cribb writes that unpopular research refers to any field of
"science liable to produce evidence unsettling to the fixed worldview held
by governments, business, special interest lobbies or that most
anonymous and unaccountable of research contollers, the stakeholders".
He also appears to suport the democracyconcept that is the thrust of the
paper, Re-defining Aesthetics to develop Human Survival technology. He
wrote, " This process of keeping science from the public and the network
of threats - overt and implied - that protects it is undermining
democracy. A democracy without access to balance and truthfull
information on which to base its decisions is little better than a crude
Third World dictatorship in which the people are compelled to accept the
dictator's interpretation of the world, however false and fanciful."
If Bolzano's Theory of Science is indeed logical, then it can be considered
that World Peace cannot be rationally discussed by people compelled, as
prevails today, to accept a dictatorial fixed worldview. Organizations that
do not realize this would appear unable to logically contribute to World
Peace at all. This concept is why the United Nations University
organization, referred to in the ethics paper, would appreciate a positive
review of that paper.
Regards, Professor Robert Pope.
Kim xx
Edited by Sacredstar on 10 March 2006 at 12:22pm
__________________
Heath and Education will change and catch up with new science and new biology. Solutions to the root causes.
www.spiritualpsychology.co.uk
|
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Be The Change Forums : Be The Change Chat
Topic: The Muzzling of Science
